OnwardReviewCriteria
Here are the review criteria I proposed to the Steering Commmittee:- Technical contribution-how substantial is the contribution
- Novelty-how novel or innovative are the ideas
- Substantiation-how well substantiated is the contribution (e.g., proof supplied, implementation completed and tested, experiments performed according to accepted methods)
- Presentation-how clearly written and presented is the material
- Argument-how compelling or well-made are the arguments in the paper
- Art/Craft-how well does the paper demonstrate, describe, or promote excellence of artistry or craft in architecture, design, implementation, methodology, or documentation -rpg
back to OnwardPlanning