ProgramCommittee2005
Let's try something new. I need to put together a program committee for OOPSLA 2005. I'd like some new blood (or perhaps a smaller percentage of the old blood). The list of program committee members from 1996-2004 are in PastCommittees. Please list your nominations for new committee members (or old ones I should really keep). Add yourself if you like. -rpg
- Matthias Felleisen - a new "theory" guy with a functional bent
- Theo D'Hondt -- not a new guy, new "theory" and old practice -- lots of good papers out of his group -- European, academic, EU projects, good link with industry
- Jim Haungs -- not a new guy, but an "old" guy who has had some very innovative ideas in the past (you can put the credit or blame of the "Gang of four show trial" on him). Very good at sideways thinking.
- You should perhaps avoid people who have served for numerous years in a row - if for no other reason but to give them a break. [ RonCrocker ]
- Steven Fraser -- new guy to the program committee, but not a new guy. [ RonCrocker ]
- DaveClarke - ex-student of mine, formalised ownership types now hacking coordination languages at CWI JamesNoble
- JonathanAldrich - more ownership types & aspect-languages JamesNoble
- MaryBethRosson - has credit in both OO & UI communities (be nice to have at least one UI person on the committee) JamesNoble
- PeterSommerlad - I don't fear volunteering. And I want to get in touch with OOPSLA again after some year of more or less 'forced' absence.
I would love to help review Technical reports or Practitioners reports, if any. And I am interested in the Essay track. MartineDevos
I don't feel it appropriate to nominate myself - a kiwi cultural thing . Also, my students & I still hope to submit something (if there is something to which to submit) so I'm doubly conflicted. I thought about going through the last 3 years of OOPSLA & ECOOP and finding authors that have published technical papers that I thought were interesting, that we wanted to encourage, or that represented active subareas of research - but then I realised how much time it would take. I still like the idea though. JamesNoble.